The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review
Xian‐Tao Zeng, Yonggang Zhang, Joey S.W. Kwong, Chao Zhang, Sheng Li, Feng Sun, Yu‐Ming Niu, Liang Du
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2015
Abstract
This research paper explore the methodology and findings associated with Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. The study delves into the core aspects of the research field, providing significant data and citation impact. (Full abstract processing is available via the OpenAlex API).
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both 2017
- The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence 2014
- Critical Appraisal of a Systematic Review: A Concise Review 2022
- Appendix 2: Critical Appraisal Tools 2006
- The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews: Addressing Questions of Prevalence 2014
- Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. 2002
- Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review. 1998
- Types of Study in Medical Research 2009
- Aid to the evaluation of therapeutic studies. 1989
- The quality of clinical practice guidelines in <scp>C</scp>hina: a systematic assessment 2012